The Year of State Sovereignty?
By Bernie Quigley
At a press conference last October, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) was asked: “Madam Speaker, where specifically does the Constitution grant Congress the authority to enact an individual health insurance mandate?”
She replied with that wild-eyed self-assurance that grew more shrill and extreme as we got to Christmas: “Are you serious? Are you serious?”
She shook her head and moved on. Her aide, Nadeam Elshami, said that questioning the Speaker about whether the Constitution authorizes Congress to mandate that individuals buy healthcare was not “a serious question.”
This week the Virginia Senate passed a bill prohibiting a requirement for Virginians to purchase healthcare insurance. With a Republican state House and governor, this bill will likely make it into law.
In an effort led by Texas Gov. Rick Perry (R), more than two-thirds of the states have introduced measures to stop individual mandates on healthcare. Many state attorneys general threaten lawsuits if current federal reform proposals are passed into law. The Heritage Foundation reports that state legislators across the country are considering various bills that would allow their state to opt out of key provisions of ObamaCare or provide state voters a chance at the ballot box to reject nationalized healthcare in their state.
“Regardless of legislative components of the Virginia action yesterday, conservatives should cheer the resurgence of federalism and what it means for reining in the rapidly increasing federal government. With most states starting their legislative sessions, this may be just the beginning of what could be the ‘Year for State Sovereignty,’ ” says Dani Doane, director of government relations at the Heritage Foundation.
(Editor’s Note: If this does not show how out-of-touch or even dismissive of the People and their will our Speaker of the House is, I’m not sure what would. No one, no one disputes the need for reform. But a cost-effective, patient-centered approach is the only way to go. Any plan that mandates purchase of a government “option” (please!) under penalty of a fine or even jail time cannot and should not be taken seriously. And that’s precisely why 2/3rds of the People oppose it. ~Dan Blanchard)
