March, 2010

...now browsing by month

 

“It Will Drive Down Costs…” Says WHO??

Wednesday, March 31st, 2010

It’s the Economy, Stupid. 

James Carville’s words are as true now as they were in 1992. Last week, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported unemployment was higher in 27 states in February. The national unemployment rate is now at 9.7, up from 8.2 percent a year earlier. Since last year alone, the economy has shed another 3.2 million jobs-all while the President and Democrats on Capitol Hill focused on the virtues of legislation that increases premiums and raises taxes.  There’s not an economist in the whole world who believes a government should raise taxes during a deep recession. 

Unfortunately, that’s exactly what the White House is doing.  This new “cost-reducing” law:

  • Increases Deficits. At $12 trillion, the U.S. debt is the largest it’s ever been-and growing at an astonishing pace. At $940 billion, government-run health care will not only increase the debt, but the rate at which the debt grows.
  • Reduces Quality. It waters-down the Medicare coverage of 33 million Americans and renders 20% of U.S. hospitals unprofitable because of Medicaid spending cuts. Worse, it encourages employers to cease employer-provided insurance and instead push millions of Americans into poorly administered Medicaid-like plans.
  • Increases Cost. It raises taxes by $569.2 billion, steals roughly $500 billion from Medicare and robs another $52 billion from Social Security. It increases premiums for individual insurance by 54% and family premiums by $2,100.
  • Limits Access. It will push an estimated 19 million Americans off their employer-based plan and 11.5 million off Medicare Advantage. It provides 32 million Americans access to doctors, but fails to appropriate any funds for new doctors and hospitals and, even worse, systematically underpays medical providers.

Jeanette Nordstrom
National Center for Policy Analysis
www.ncpa.org

It’s “Only” $3 Trillion More…

Wednesday, March 31st, 2010

OBAMA’S $3,000,000,000,000 TAX HIKE

When he released his new budget proposal on February 1, President Barack Obama asserted that the government “simply cannot continue to spend as if deficits don’t have consequences; as if waste doesn’t matter; as if the hard-earned tax dollars of the American people can be treated like Monopoly money; as if we can ignore this challenge for another generation.”  (empasis added, Editor)

Yet the President’s new budget does exactly that, according to Brian Riedl, the Grover M. Hermann Fellow in Federal Budgetary Affairs at the Heritage Foundation:

  • The budget would permanently expand the federal government by 3 percent of gross domestic product over 2007 prerecession levels.
  • Taxes would be raised on all Americans by nearly $3 trillion over the next decade.
  • It would raise taxes for 3.2 million small businesses and upper-income taxpayers by an average of $300,000 over the next decade.
  • For every dollar spent in 2010, 42 cents would be borrowed.

In addition, the budget:

  • Would run a $1.6 trillion deficit in 2010 — $143 billion higher than the recession-driven 2009 deficit.
  • Would leave permanent deficits that top $1 trillion as late as 2020.
  • Would dump an additional $74,000 per household of debt into the laps of our children and grandchildren.
  • Would double the publicly held national debt to over $18 trillion.

According to Riedl, President Obama has offered a budget that does nothing to address the nation’s serious short-term and long-term fiscal problems — and indeed makes them worse.

Source: Brian Riedl, “Obama’s $3,000,000,000,000 Tax Hike,” Wall Street Journal, March 10, 2010.

For text:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703976804575114151637806636.html?mod=WSJ_Opinion_LEFTSecondBucket

Historian: TEA Party More Important Than GOP

Tuesday, March 30th, 2010

Grass-roots tea party activists are on the verge of triggering another “Reagan revolution,” and have actually begun to overshadow the GOP in importance, according to conservative historian and author Craig Shirley.

“The incredible explosion of government and the concentration of power in Washington, the money and the lobbyists, should give alarm to any traditional conservative…” Shirley says during an exclusive interview with Newsmax TV’s Kathleen Walter. 

Shirley, the CEO and president of Shirley & Banister Public Affairs, has written a new book, “Rendezvous With Destiny: Ronald Reagan and the Campaign That Changed America,” with a foreword by columnist George F. Will.

Shirley says eight years of governance by Republicans who veered away from conservative principles set the stage for Reagan’s emergence. And during the George W. Bush years, Shirley says, the GOP repeated its mistake of transforming itself into “the second big-government party in America.” 

Shirley says that in many ways the tea party movement “has overtaken the Republican Party.” As evidence, he cites the grass-roots organizations’ ability to draw hundreds of thousands of rally-goers to the Nation’s Capital.

“You have to ask yourself one question: Could the Republican Party turn those numbers out on the Mall here in Washington? The answer, I think everybody would agree, is no,” Shirley concludes. “So right now, in many ways, the tea party movement is more formidable, and more important, than the Republican Party establishment is itself.”

Shirley says the GOP should focus “on mending relations with the tea party, and making amends for the mistakes of the last eight years.”

“I’ve come to the conclusion, whether through my faith or my belief in enlightenment, that freedom is the inherent destiny of all people, especially here in this country. And that government poses the most direct threat to that freedom today,” he says. “I put my faith in the American people, and the individual dignity and privacy of the American individual today, so I come down firmly on the side of the citizenry over the state.”

Full article linked here:  http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/tea-party-gop-reagan/2010/03/29/id/354176?PROMO_CODE=7A0A-1

Stop Passing Bills We Can’t Afford!!!

Tuesday, March 30th, 2010

A HEALTHY DOSE OF CATASTROPHE

In 2003, Congress passed the Medicare prescription drug benefit.  However, in order to discourage American businesses from immediately dumping all their drug plans for retirees, Congress gave them a tax break equivalent to 28 percent of the cost of the plan.

Fast-forward to the dawn of the Obamacare utopia.  In one of many little clauses in a 2,000-page bill, Congress voted to subject the 28 percent tax benefit to the corporate tax rate of 35 percent.

On the day President Obama signed Obamacare into law, Verizon sent an e-mail to all of its employees warning that the company’s costs “will increase in the short term.” And in the medium term?  U.S. corporations that are able to do so will get out of their prescription drug plan and toss their retirees onto the Medicare pile, says Mark Steyn, author of New York Times best-seller America Alone

  • About 3,500 businesses presently claim the 28 percent tax break.
  • The cost to taxpayers of that 28 percent benefit is about $665 per person.
  • The cost to taxpayers of equivalent Medicare coverage is about $1,200 per person.
  • This means adding more to the ranks of Medicare as corporation’s drop their retiree drug plans will roughly double the cost of covering an estimated five million retirees.

This single component of health care reform neatly encompasses all the broader trends about where America is headed — not just in terms of increased costs and worse care, but also in the remorseless governmentalization of American life and the disincentivization of the private sector, according to Steyn.

Source: Mark Steyn, “Steyn: A healthy dose of catastrophe,” Washington Times, March 27, 2010.

For text:   

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/mar/27/a-healthy-dose-of-catastrophe/

Louisville TEA Party Endorses Rand Paul

Tuesday, March 30th, 2010

         In a rare move, the Louisville Grassroots TEA Party officially announced on Monday that it is offering its endorsement to Dr. Rand Paul’s campaign for the people’s U.S. Senate seat, soon to be vacated by Jim Bunning.  The grassroots activist organization’s mission is to promote—through peaceful gatherings and educational outreach—fiscally responsible, smaller, Constitutionally-limited government and free market solutions to the issues that face America. 

        According to the TEA Party, Rand Paul’s message has been clearly and consistently driven by Constitutional principles.  The signature distinctions between Dr. Paul and his campaign opposition are his outside-the-establishment appeal and his unflinching commitment to term limits.  Additionally, Rand continues to criss-cross the state in making himself readily available to Kentuckians.  His easy demeanor and face-to-face accessibility make him very ‘of the People.’  The solutions most desperately needed by our Commonwealth and our country aren’t going to come from career politicians from either party.   Rand Paul offers a refreshing alternative to the reckless, irresponsible, business-as-usual politics that characterize Washington. 

“A” is for Apple. Over-Priced, Subsidized Apples

Monday, March 29th, 2010

 (Editor’s note:  This is a portion of a March 29, 2010 column by Star Parker, who is running for Congress in California’s 37th District.)

Let’s do a quick thought experiment.

The price of apples keeps going up. The government decides that every American must buy apples. But some can’t afford them.

Government starts controlling how much apple farmers are paid, it mandates that every single American buys apples and subsidizes those under a certain income level so they can.

Will the price of apples go down, stay the same or go up? Or, in economists’ language, if you limit the supply of a commodity and increase demand, will the price of that commodity go up or down?

Did you say “up”? You get an A. But if you did say “up,” you surely are not a Democrat.

Democrats have just committed multitrillions of our money, and, as a bonus, sold a big chunk of American freedom down the road, betting that everything a college freshman learns in basic economics is not true. Or, that health care doesn’t follow the rules of economics. Because our new health-care system is pretty much the apple scenario described above.

…as more Americans get herded onto the government plantation — 30 million more with this new bill — it’s easy to keep them there. So the most likely political outcome going forward is higher taxes and income redistribution to pay for it all, entrenching socialism more.

As I have written before, if you want to know where it all leads, look at our inner cities that were long ago taken over by government compassion. This is our future, my fellow Americans.

How to Improve Your Re-Election Chances by 12 Million…

Sunday, March 28th, 2010

(Editor’s Note: Don’t you think for a moment that this isn’t the next huge political move on the horizon…)

The ONLY Numbers That Ultimately Matter

Friday, March 26th, 2010


The CBO Charts Impending $ocial $ecurity Crisis

Friday, March 26th, 2010

(Editor’s Note:   In just the Social Security program alone, there is $5 trillion in “unfunded liabilities.”   This is the amount promised to recipients that the government (the trustees/managers of this fund) does not have.   It will be $5 trillion in the red this year.  Projections saying that this would not happen until “at least 2016 or 2017″ have proven inaccurate.  It is the first case of the implications of the tsunami of debt that will soon hit us all.  This is the greatest issue that faces America.  And if our leaders do not start taking it seriously–and act like it–we will replace them with those that do.   A shrinking working base due to massive unemployment and a wave of new retirees mean there are fewer and fewer people to tax!  This is one more example of how we cannot afford this ludicrous government takeover of health care.   If this is not addressed, and very soon, it is the beginning of the end of America’s way of life as we’ve come to know it.)

 

What Big Government Program Has EVER…

Thursday, March 25th, 2010

• Reduced the deficit?
• Only cost what it says it will and lowered the costs of goods and services?
• Improved quality?
• Enhanced efficiency?
• Decreased delays?
• Fostered more choice and competition?
• Featured competent bureaucracy?
• Operated with honest accounting?
• Avoided fraud, abuse, waste, maddening red tape, and higher taxes?

~~John Kraushar